Skip to content

GuideLegal status · record, not advice

Kalshi in Pennsylvania: Legal Status

Short answer. Pennsylvania's Gaming Control Board names Kalshi in comments calling sports-event contracts sports wagering, and the state's Attorney General backs New Jersey's Supreme Court petition in Kalshi's case. No Pennsylvania order naming Kalshi was located.

Pennsylvania Predictions staff · · Status as of October 16, 2026 · Last reviewed Oct 16, 2026 · Next review Oct 30, 2026 · 11 sources

At a glance

One platform · what the record documents for each, and the next dated step
PlatformStatusAs ofNext date
KalshiAs of October 16, 2026, the Pennsylvania record naming Kalshi consists of the Gaming Control Board's April 30, 2026 comments to the CFTC, which name Kalshi and state the Board's view that contracts on sporting events are sports wagering [1], and the October 7, 2026 states' brief in Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC, No. 26-299, which Pennsylvania's Attorney General signed [4]. No Pennsylvania court case with Kalshi as a party and no Board order or penalty directed at Kalshi was located, and this page draws no conclusion about Kalshi's standing in Pennsylvania.Oct 7, 2026—

Basis for this pageThe Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board's comments to the CFTC of April 30, 2026 (RIN 3038-AF65), which name Kalshi and state the Board's view that contracts on sporting events are sports wagering under Pennsylvania law (4 Pa.C.S. §13C01, §13C04); and the October 7, 2026 amici brief of Ohio, 38 other states and the District of Columbia in Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC, No. 26-299, signed by Pennsylvania's Attorney General.

Timeline

Oldest first, from the documents themselves
  • The Sports Wagering chapter of Title 4 (Sections 13C01 onward) is enacted; it counts exchange wagering as sports wagering and makes it an offense to offer sports wagering to people in Pennsylvania without a Board certificate. [5]
  • KalshiEX, LLC v. Flaherty, No. 25-1922: a divided Third Circuit panel affirms the preliminary injunction against New Jersey's enforcement of its gambling law against Kalshi's sports-related event contracts. [2]
  • The Gaming Control Board's comments to the CFTC name Kalshi among venues listing event contracts and state that contracts on sporting events are sports wagering. [1]
  • The Board releases the CFTC comments publicly. [7]
  • New Jersey's officials file a petition for certiorari, Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC, No. 26-299. [3]
  • Kalshi's time to respond is extended to November 9, 2026. [3]
  • Pennsylvania's Attorney General joins Ohio, 37 other states and the District of Columbia in a brief supporting review. [4]

This page is not legal advice. It reports the Gaming Control Board's statements naming Kalshi and the court record in Kalshi's New Jersey case, each with its date, and draws no conclusion about whether Kalshi may operate in Pennsylvania or whether anyone in Pennsylvania may trade on it.

Common questions

Is Kalshi legal in Pennsylvania?

This page draws no legal conclusion. As of October 16, 2026, no Pennsylvania court order or Gaming Control Board action naming Kalshi had been located, though the Board's April 30, 2026 comments to the CFTC name Kalshi and describe contracts on sporting events as sports wagering.

Has the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board ordered Kalshi to stop?

No such order was located. The Board's press releases through October 14, 2026 announce no cease-and-desist letter, fine or other action against Kalshi; its position appears in letters to federal officials from October 2025 and April 30, 2026.

What did the Third Circuit decide in KalshiEX v. Flaherty?

On April 6, 2026 it affirmed a preliminary injunction barring New Jersey from enforcing its gambling law against Kalshi's sports-related event contracts, finding a reasonable chance of success on federal preemption. It was a New Jersey case, and Pennsylvania was not a party.

Why did Pennsylvania's Attorney General sign a brief in Kalshi's case?

Attorney General David W. Sunday, Jr. signed the October 7, 2026 brief of Ohio, 38 other states and the District of Columbia urging the Supreme Court to take New Jersey's petition in No. 26-299. The brief says courts are divided on whether federal law preempts state sports-gambling laws.

When does the Supreme Court case move next?

Kalshi's response to the petition is due November 9, 2026. The docket showed no conference date as of October 16, 2026, and this page is reviewed again by October 30, 2026.

Sources

  1. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, comments to the CFTC on prediction markets (April 30, 2026) — gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov
  2. Third Circuit opinion, KalshiEX, LLC v. Flaherty, No. 25-1922 (April 6, 2026) — www2.ca3.uscourts.gov
  3. Supreme Court docket No. 26-299, Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC — supremecourt.gov
  4. Brief of Amici Curiae Ohio, 38 Other States, and the District of Columbia, No. 26-299 (October 7, 2026) — supremecourt.gov
  5. 4 Pa.C.S. Chapter 13C, Sports Wagering (Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes) — palegis.us
  6. 28 U.S.C. §41, number and composition of circuits (United States Code, govinfo) — govinfo.gov
  7. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board press release, comments to the CFTC on prediction markets (May 5, 2026) — gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov
  8. CourtListener RECAP search, Pennsylvania federal districts and the Third Circuit: Kalshi — courtlistener.com
  9. CourtListener RECAP search, Pennsylvania federal districts and the Third Circuit: KalshiEX — courtlistener.com
  10. CourtListener RECAP search, all courts: Kalshi with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board — courtlistener.com
  11. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board press releases, March 2 to October 14, 2026 — gamingcontrolboard.pa.gov